![]() ![]() The works of these philosophers form the basis for philosophical debate. Encountering such passages can be problematic for women who are involved in the attempt to develop a distinctively feminist approach to philosophy. According to Aristotle and Aquinas, a woman is a ‘misbegotten male’. They are ‘big children their whole life long’ (Schopenhauer). Women are described as ‘the devil’s gateway’ (Tertullian). ![]() the puzzling question of the nature of ‘woman’.1 Who is woman? What does ‘she’ want? Almost uniformly, such passages offer answers to this ‘question’ which describe women in deeply unflattering terms. Margaret Whitford writes of the surprise she felt when she realized the extent to which misogyny determines the thoughts of the ‘great’ philosophers of the western tradition when they turn their attention to. ![]() When surveying the development of philosophical ideas, it should be noted that a significant part of what passes fir the canon of western philosophy goes unnoticed or is consigned to silence. The following research presents comic art as a spatial deviation from the traditional mediums of storytelling to a more easily accessible yet sophisticated body of work by decoding and analyzing the structure of the unique language of sequential visual art portrayed in Albert Uderzo and René Goscinny's Asterix and Cleopatra (1982). A red herring fallacy, is when a speaker introduces an irrelevant issue or piece of evidence to divert attention away from the original issue (Allman, 2016). Politicians, lawyers, life coaches, marketers, public speakersand ordinary. According to the lecture by Professor Allman, a fallacy is an argument that is flawed by irrelevant or inadequate evidence, erroneous reasoning, or improper expression (Allman, 2016). Red herring fallacy is a funny name for something we encounter all the time, especially when we participate (or just listen to) emotionally charged debates. Arthur Danto in his book The Transfiguration of Common Place (1981) expresses how paintings have the potential to go beyond the contemplation of merely the aesthetic qualities to an externalization of an artist's consciousness. The red herring fallacy is a logical fallacy that allows irrelevant facts to form our opinions about something. The marginalization of comics in both branches of literature and art allows diverse thematic expressions otherwise difficult to represent through traditional tools of expressions. It falls into the class of relevancy fallacies. A red herring fallacy distracts from the important and relevant issue. It presents some other issue or question that has little to no relationship to the matter at hand. The distribution of symbols and patterns in the practice of comic art systematically results in a novel language that is flexible enough to hold diverse themes relatable across age groups. The red herring fallacy got its name from the red herring (a cured and salted fish) that was often used by fugitives to divert bloodhounds with its pungent. A red herring fallacy distracts from the important and relevant issue. The structure of sequential visual art allows written text and visual images to converge at a common space devoid of polarizations. A common red herring is trying to ignore a valid point or argument someone is making by attacking someones personality, characteristics, personal attributes. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |